From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,63ed09fc54092c73
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.180.92.202 with SMTP id co10mr133378wib.1.1359765768367;
        Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:42:48 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 bp2ni11147wib.1!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: When is a rename not a rename?
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 00:42:29 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <kehndk$1lt$1@dont-email.me>
References: <6d66d1c4-ed22-446b-a9d7-dc806ae1ef8f@googlegroups.com>
	<f4d3708d-d17c-4e53-8f45-f9ac6f64ee54@googlegroups.com>
	<coikrsq8nv3b$.1xcqe2olg7bpv$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<5ab43474-0ce2-425c-836b-ff4c97587958@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 00:42:29 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="da745e888d4a5182b5fda6212bbb0a63";
	logging-data="1725"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19EktLpA3RATc5jYFie1pLX6FEOMNqmFJc="
User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508
	git://git.gnome.org/pan2)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GPV/yZgtXBydcoa/nAp+GwUjy/8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2013-02-02T00:42:29+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 01 Feb 2013 09:32:42 -0800, Adam Beneschan wrote:

> On Friday, February 1, 2013 3:27:02 AM UTC-8, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 02:44:21 -0800 (PST), Ada novice wrote:
>> 
>> > If you have a minimal example that is proving the contrary, please
>> > post it here.
>> 
>> Here is how renaming is not renaming:
> 
> Another possible example is when a subprogram renames another one but
> changes a default parameter:

There was also a recent specimen where a rename made a procedure's 
parameter disappear!

The trick was something like renaming an object.method call to just 
renamed_method.

I forget the precise details but I recall it was legal; taking its access 
was not (though astonishingly, it worked in current Gnat revisions)

- Brian