From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8143b93889fe9472 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Received: by 10.224.175.65 with SMTP id w1mr2357532qaz.7.1359540617583; Wed, 30 Jan 2013 02:10:17 -0800 (PST) Path: k2ni4107qap.0!nntp.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada standard and maximum line lengths Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 11:09:40 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8dfcf819-e1d0-4578-a795-a4bf724b5014@googlegroups.com> <5107b329$0$6556$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <5107eaed$0$6566$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <51080c38$0$6561$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 10:09:38 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="da91dd38436bbbf5b448e21e8f29aa94"; logging-data="13707"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19FmyrlMrnYBpFJ9aM064du" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:QfJ47hvrhVnVeAmfkohncoh42zE= X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2013-01-30T11:09:40+01:00 List-Id: Le 30/01/2013 08:24, Niklas Holsti a �crit : > On 13-01-30 01:47 , Jeffrey Carter wrote: >> On 01/29/2013 12:54 PM, Niklas Holsti wrote: >>> >>> If they are written in a pragma as a string, they are not Ada >>> identifiers, and the ARM limit on identifier length does not apply. >> >> There is no ARM limit on identifier length. > > Sorry. I was just abbreviating the "ARM lower bound on the length of > identifiers (lexical elements) that an Ada compiler must accept". But of > course abbreviation is not the Ada way. I have sinned, and I blush. > Of course, there is such limit (in practice). The longest identifier in a language defined package. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr