From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,8143b93889fe9472 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Received: by 10.180.89.133 with SMTP id bo5mr56235wib.6.1359689551887; Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:32:31 -0800 (PST) Path: bp2ni9421wib.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.103.MISMATCH!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.197.12.246.MISMATCH!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!216.196.98.146.MISMATCH!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!news.snarked.org!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada standard and maximum line lengths Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:15:45 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8dfcf819-e1d0-4578-a795-a4bf724b5014@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 06:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="709a3b9124d052b085bf6fc3f0a2adab"; logging-data="30479"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18+xwxYVFLBXgXrsZ5rh7dY" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:YBODd0/7pSBjvpgdO2ePbHuBc2o= X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2013-01-29T07:15:45+01:00 List-Id: Le 28/01/2013 22:29, Niklas Holsti a �crit : > In the same post in which Jeffrey quoted ARM 2.2(14), it seemed he was > reading it to mean that there is a coupling. I was asking how he deduced > that coupling. I'm asking the same question as you (J-P.), but from the > other side of the burden of proof. > > So, can you show the ARM verse that says that a compiler is not allowed > to limit identifiers to 200 characters, if it supports lines of 10,000 > characters? I don't have much to add to Randy's response. Yes, you can read the RM this way, and no it's not the way it has been interpreted either by the ACATS or implementers. Since I see no benefit in having them different, I think a fix in the RM is the best thing to do. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr