From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,9df152c1ff02365e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-08-04 13:08:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail From: rc211v Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ariane5 FAQ, Professional version, first draft Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 22:08:52 +0200 Organization: Wanadoo, l'internet avec France Telecom Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-112-1-14-100.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news-reader3.wanadoo.fr 1060027734 11994 81.50.183.100 (4 Aug 2003 20:08:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Aug 2003 20:08:54 GMT X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:41180 Date: 2003-08-04T20:08:54+00:00 List-Id: On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 05:32:00 +0400 (MSD), "Alexandre E. Kopilovitch" wrote: > >A. There are several points which are different for Ariane 5 vs. Ariane 4, >one of which was instrumental to the events: Ariane 4 is a vertical launch >vehicle where as Ariane 5 is slightly tilted. > Ariane 4 software was developed to tolerate certain amount of inclination >but not as much as required by Ariane 5. It's absolutely incredible. As far as you know, do you believe a conspiracy theory? This FAQ is very interesting.