From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3e070dca458e63a6
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.180.93.134 with SMTP id cu6mr1702938wib.5.1358654442317;
        Sat, 19 Jan 2013 20:00:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 i11ni8359wiw.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.131.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder3.xlned.com!border5.a.newsrouter.astraweb.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!newsfeed.news.ucla.edu!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: More Ganssle on Ada
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 22:56:54 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <kdakms$rjm$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <dd600937-5e96-4bde-b034-d54411ae4162@googlegroups.com>
 <kd9u6h$9a7$2@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1358485020 28278 69.95.181.76 (18 Jan 2013 04:57:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 04:57:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2013-01-17T22:56:54-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

The article also claimed that Ada wouldn't be a good choice for a web 
server. Besides the fact that I wrote my own web server in Ada, I suspect 
all of the people using AWS would disagree. Perhaps the author meant web 
*client* (where the choices are "Javascript" or something that compiles into 
Javascript).

                                             Randy.