From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ac5c3bc59168d76
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: johndoe (johndoe)
Subject: Re: Subprogram Renaming
Date: 1996/04/10
Message-ID: <kd68b7ycsl.fsf@dsd.camb>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 146799727
sender: johndoe@dsd.camb
x-nntp-posting-host: dsd.camb.inmet.com
references: <md5:95D854EBD1A47E0E86027A3CC7DBD9A4>
organization: Intermetrics, Inc,  Cambridge, MA
reply-to: johndoe@inmet.com (Bus error - core dumped)
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-04-10T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <316BC3D6.14E7@csehp3.mdc.com> "James A. Squire" <m193884@CSEHP3.MDC.COM> writes:
>
>Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
>Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 09:21:10 -0500
>
>Are you saying that the above is legal in Ada95?  So defaults can be
>different?  (I'm sure this is illegal in Ada83)

the examples were taken directly from a program developed using ada95.
and the original idea came from programs written in ada83 using the same
idea.  having procedures rename other procedures with different default
values is not illegal in ada83.

--johndoe