From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,19750641bd2d1664 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.24.130 with SMTP id u2mr9021149wif.6.1356941076818; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 00:04:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: i11ni342993wiw.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.86.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newspeer1.nac.net!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin-spool!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!reality.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: QtAda for Qt 5.0? Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:05:06 -0600 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1356739508 11678 69.95.181.76 (29 Dec 2012 00:05:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:05:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Date: 2012-12-28T18:05:06-06:00 List-Id: "Vadim Godunko" wrote in message news:bfaefb2a-681d-4631-a5fd-b073debcd65f@googlegroups.com... > On Sunday, December 23, 2012 1:16:30 PM UTC+4, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > >> Don't know wether QtAda is ready for Qt5, yet, so I guess Qt5Ada >> currently >> is the only choice if one needs Qt5. Maybe Vadim Godunko can comment? >> > It will be available in beginning of next year. That's essentially the same as saying "next week" (as the beginning of next year is on Tuesday). :-) I suspect this is not quite what you meant. Randy.