From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,e793d50ead4087cc X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.96.231 with SMTP id dv7mr9039919wib.6.1356939910343; Sun, 30 Dec 2012 23:45:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: l12ni274822wiv.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!82.197.223.108.MISMATCH!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.86.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newspeer1.nac.net!news.mi.ras.ru!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Thickening Ada GTK or Vala Binding ? Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:56:05 -0600 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <0c94b952-2bdf-4f25-98a3-91a67ed2355d@googlegroups.com> <7a2f4daa-b7b6-4afd-980d-be28a19735cd@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1356738967 11445 69.95.181.76 (28 Dec 2012 23:56:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 23:56:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Date: 2012-12-28T17:56:05-06:00 List-Id: "Justin Time" wrote in message news:7a2f4daa-b7b6-4afd-980d-be28a19735cd@googlegroups.com... ... > The difficult point for me is to mix multi-tasking with GTK that is not > thread-safe. Neither Vala not Simple_Gtk will do the job for you. That was the difficult part of designing Claw, as we did make Claw safe for multi-tasking in the same way that the predefined Ada libraries are (Claw routines are reenterant so long as the objects passed are "not overlapping" - we have example programs which show tasks writing into separate windows or controls simultaneously). You wouldn't have had to spend much effort to mix multi-tasking with Claw (although call-backs can't be blocking, so there is some problem with communicating between tasks). Of course, Claw is only for Windows (at least right now). Randy/