comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kayloe@Xenon.Stanford.EDU (Jordan Kayloe)
Subject: Re: How Strict is DOD Ada Requirement?
Date: 1996/03/23
Date: 1996-03-23T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <kayloe.827545011@Xenon.Stanford.EDU> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4iuhsf$hg8@siberia.gtri.gatech.edu


Bill Marshall asks:
> The Department of Defense is strongly promoting COTS-based streamlined
> acquisition to reduce the cost of weapon system development and
> procurement (COTS => commercial off the shelf).  A central facet of
> these cost reduction efforts is the deletion of MIL-SPECS and other
> burdensome Government requirements from some procurement packages.
> Does anyone have any insights or experience as to how this affects the
> mandate to use Ada in DOD systems?
> 
---------------------------------------
Ted Dennison writes:
> Yes, it changes it immensly. Instead of using MIL-STD-1815A-1983 Ada, 
> programs are now mandated to use ANSI-STD-1815A-1983 Ada. This ANSI 
> standard is specified in the document labeled ANSI/MIL-STD-1815A-1983.
> 
> (For the sarcasm impared: yes, they are the SAME standard).
---------------------------------------
Robert Dewar says:
>   Hello, is that Software Etc.? I was wondering if you were expecting any
>   useful new intercontinental missile system software to be soon, because
>   I searched your shelves and could not find any. I would also be interested
>   in any Jet fighter avionics you have ........ No, Nintendo games are
>   not suitable for our purposes   :-)
---------------------------------------


Regarding Mr Marshall's inquiry, the excerpt below comes from 
page 2 of Request for Proposal Annex B, System Requirements 
Document for the NAVSTAR Global Positioning System (GPS) Block 
IIF System.  This is a 33 satellite procurement covering many 
years and many billion dollars.  Award is scheduled for 23 April.  
You can see only two Mil-Stds are included, and the Ada standard
keeps some pretty serious company.  (Apologies for any format 
problems.)

Mr Dennison's sarcasm is right on.

Dr Dewar might be surprised to know that the GPS Operational Control
System is being replaced with a system that is 80% COTS.  There
are at least four COTS products currently available to command and 
control military satellites.  Air Force Space Command has selected 
one of these to replace the basis of every one of their satellite
control segments.  Soon is rapidly approaching...

--
JORDAN R. KAYLOE, Captain, USAF   e-mail: kayloe@cs.stanford.edu
NAVSTAR GPS Joint Program Office          kayloejr@gps1.laafb.af.mil 


--------------------------------------------------------
2.0		DOCUMENTS

The following documents describe the GPS sustainment baseline and
establish the basis for the Block IIF interoperability
requirements.  First tier documents directly referenced in this
SRD are applicable to the extent specifically stated.
 
2.1		Compliance Specifications

Interface Requirements Specifications (IRSs) for the NAVSTAR 
Global Positioning System:

IRS-GPS-SS/NU-01	Space-to-Nav User (IRS-01) 
IRS-GPS-SS/OU-02 	Space-to-NDS User (IRS-02)
IRS-GPS-SS/CS-03	Space-to-Control (IRS-03)
IRS-GPS-CS/OI-04	Control-to-Other (IRS-04)
IRS-GPS-SV/SV-05	Space Vehicle-to-Space Vehicle (IRS-05)
IRS-GPS-SV/NDS-06	Space Vehicle-to-NDS Payload (IRS-06) 
IRS-GPS-SV/LV-07	Space Vehicle to Launch Vehicle (IRS-07)
IRS-GPS-SV/RAP-08	Space Vehicle-to-RAP (IRS-08)
IRS-GPS-SS/RU-09	Space-to-RAP User (IRS-09)
IRS-GPS-SS/AFSCN-10	Space-to-AFSCN (IRS-10)

2.2		Compliance Military Standards

MIL-STD-461D		Electromagnetic Emission Susceptibility
                        Requirements for the Control of
		        Electromagnetic Interference (As Tailored)
						
MIL-STD-462D		Measurement of Electromagnetic Interference
			Characteristics	(As Tailored)

2.3		Other Compliance Documents

AFR 122-16		Nuclear Safety Review Procedures for Space or	 		                Missile Use of Radioactive Sources

KAG-30A/TSEC            Compromising Emanations Standard for				                Cryptographic Equipment (U)

ISO 8652-95             Ada Programming Language




  parent reply	other threads:[~1996-03-23  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1996-03-22  0:00 How Strict is DOD Ada Requirement? William S Marshall IV
1996-03-22  0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1996-03-22  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-23  0:00 ` Jordan Kayloe [this message]
1996-03-22  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1996-03-25  0:00 ` Ken Garlington
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox