From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ef86a63a9935f39 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-27 13:55:45 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!cyclone.swbell.net!nnrp1.sbc.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Pat Rogers" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <9hdc6v$ln3$1@news.huji.ac.il> Subject: Re: Easiest graph pakcage X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:55:44 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.184.67 X-Complaints-To: abuse@swbell.net X-Trace: nnrp1.sbc.net 993675344 208.191.184.67 (Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:55:44 CDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:55:44 CDT Organization: SBC Internet Services Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9165 Date: 2001-06-27T15:55:44-05:00 List-Id: The "NOSC Tools" for Ada 83 that were developed by Intermetrics has a graph package I've used many times in the past. I believe those packages are on the PAL, or the ASR, or whatever it is called nowadays... "Ehud Lamm" wrote in message news:9hdc6v$ln3$1@news.huji.ac.il... > What's the easiest to use package for graph based algortihms? I am looking > for something the exports a graph data type, and allows the obvious > operations. Not something overly clever, just something that can be easily > resued by students to build interesting stuff that's based on using graph > representations. I'd love to have the standard operations (e.g., transitive > closure) but I can even live without those. I want the package to use as > basic Ada as possible, which essentially means no tagged types. Generic are > fine. > > I know of the Booch components, of course, but it seems to me that > installing them and understanding their terminology (managed/unmanaged etc.) > is quite an overkill for what I have in mind. > > Any suggestions? > > -- > Ehud Lamm mslamm@mscc.huji.ac.il > http://purl.oclc.org/NET/ehudlamm <== Me! > > > > > >