From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-23 06:54:30 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc Subject: Re: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died (was): 64 bit addressing and OOP Date: 23 Apr 2003 08:54:26 -0500 Organization: Berbee Information Networks Corporation Message-ID: References: <9fa75d42.0302250710.5549baaf@posting.google.com> <3E5C7033.BD5DC462@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0302260618.7506cba7@posting.google.com> <3E5CF5C6.84822F57@adaworks.com> <8qkczsAcGcn+Ew83@nildram.co.uk> <3EA04A1E.CAFC1FEF@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0304221126.7112b7d5@posting.gOrganization: LJK Software <9fa75d42.030423Organization: LJK Software NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1051106016 19208 192.135.80.34 (23 Apr 2003 13:53:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:53:36 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:62549 comp.object:61667 comp.lang.ada:36409 misc.misc:13602 Date: 2003-04-23T08:54:26-05:00 List-Id: In article <9fa75d42.0304230515.48064263@posting.google.com>, softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng) writes: > Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:... >> In article <9fa75d42.0304221126.7112b7d5@posting.google.com>, softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng) writes: >> > (C and later C++ style of type-safety turned out to >> > be good enough for real-world projects.) >> >> Like Windows ? > You don't like Windows, so you must be using > what? Unix and X-Windows? Written/extended/in Ada? At this instant I am using VMS, which thankfully written mostly before the current C-mania started. Even when they use C on Alpha and Itanium now, those who develop VMS tend to use the safer techniques they learned with Bliss in place of the null-terminated strings and other garbage that is encouraged by C.