From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e51f94f876618e37
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.138.14 with SMTP id qm14mr5525805pbb.5.1352532440524;
        Fri, 09 Nov 2012 23:27:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 s9ni2852pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Question[s] about aliased extended return.
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 01:27:13 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <k7kvkm$3k2$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <9bbd99bd-f953-434d-b3c8-6e8a6d5c7dfd@googlegroups.com>
 <k7hjj5$kj9$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <bc5c504b-6261-4a18-a7b6-36bb95fabd7f@googlegroups.com>
 <77906f56-8ea0-4d87-8ace-4db1172958cd@googlegroups.com>
 <op.wnizz1nvule2fv@cardamome>
 <5dd387bf-f15e-4800-8c92-ceb87c956581@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1352532438 3714 69.95.181.76 (10 Nov 2012 07:27:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:27:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Date: 2012-11-10T01:27:13-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Shark8" <onewingedshark@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:5dd387bf-f15e-4800-8c92-ceb87c956581@googlegroups.com...
>As I have it the thin binding is only in the package-bodies, completely 
>unexposed to the client.

I've tended to put them in private packages (or the private part), mainly so 
each API only needs to be defined once. By putting them in the private part 
or in private packages, child units can use them, but clients still don't 
have access. Of course, if you're CERTAIN that you'll NEVER need to use the 
same API somewhere else, the body is probably better. (But who's certain of 
anything?? :-)

                              Randy.