From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-23 20:16:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail From: gerhard.nospam@bigfoot.de (Gerhard =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E4ring?=) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Open Source Approach (was Progress on AdaOS) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 03:04:20 +0200 Organization: T-Online Message-ID: References: <9IFe7.12813$6R6.1221214@news1.cableinet.net> <9lghqu$ac6$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B7C3293.76F49097@home.com> <9lhefg$lgd$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B7D47F1.25D6FC78@boeing.com> <5ee5b646.0108171856.18631c4c@posting.google.com> <3B7F624B.7294D24F@acm.org> <9lr6je$5hj$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9ltoi7$4is$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B82789B.8D195045@home.com> <9ltuo8$70n$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B829450.879B0396@home.com> <9m0d08$51j$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B83DE1A.7770DC9C@home.com> <9m0rc6$ak0$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <3B83F894.D7082F9A@home.com> <9m12li$db7$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <9m1u2m$baq2@news.cis.okstate.edu> <3B853A8F.2291152F@home.com> Reply-To: gerhard@bigfoot.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: news.t-online.com 998622766 03 19447 hsXKS3KESvAOSR 010824 03:12:46 X-Complaints-To: abuse@t-online.com X-Sender: 510095183908-0001@t-dialin.net User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:12369 Date: 2001-08-24T03:04:20+02:00 List-Id: On Thu, 23 Aug 2001 17:17:04 GMT, Warren W. Gay VE3WWG wrote: >[...] >The one thing that bugs me now is that there are so _many_ different >products for Linux/FreeBSD, that it can be time consuming picking >the best of breed. I wish RedHat or some other organization would >provide an "Evaluation Service", in order to save us time. > >One way it might work, is that you get a 3 point evaluation for free: > > 1 - Gotta have > 2 - OK > 3 - Don't bother > >but for better grading results, you pay for the service. Something like >the following, or maybe a 10-point system: > > 1 - Gotta have > 2 - Excellent > 3 - Above par > 4 - par > 5 - below par > 6 - Poor > 7 - Don't bother > >Additionally, perhaps a "usefulness" measurement. For example, there >must be a ton of "list your directory in colour" scripts, commands and >whatever (usefulness = very low). I hate wasting my time sorting >through these less useful contributions. This feature is now available on freshmeat.net. You can rate the entries. Sourceforge.net even has a rating system for open-source developers (coding skills/leadership/...). Gerhard -- mail: gerhard bigfoot de registered Linux user #64239 web: http://www.cs.fhm.edu/~ifw00065/ public key at homepage public key fingerprint: DEC1 1D02 5743 1159 CD20 A4B6 7B22 6575 86AB 43C0 reduce(lambda x,y:x+y,map(lambda x:chr(ord(x)^42),tuple('zS^BED\nX_FOY\x0b')))