From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3025dd6d917b499c X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 Received: by 10.180.75.197 with SMTP id e5mr1346274wiw.1.1351391093740; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 19:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Path: q13ni70614wii.0!nntp.google.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.13.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Brian Drummond Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada, the best language with the not-so-best tool chain Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <38af7fb8-b0a4-4a31-87aa-b7b698cc89c3@googlegroups.com> <3ca0ffd0-1764-484b-8fab-17c0d2dd9463@googlegroups.com> <1f645050-cf4c-40bf-a797-9687b69e4a54@googlegroups.com> <18ats2960nsvm$.kfufsnul13aq$.dlg@40tude.net> <5072c9ae$0$6562$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <4keoa6epdxt7.1nnwxy7v7ar90.dlg@40tude.net> <5072dc68$0$6554$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1f7cmfp1l65w1.1deog8cfxbs0u$.dlg@40tude.net> <5072e37a$0$6556$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <1wzhg6cdjkwjj$.uq66rzr2nlgy.dlg@40tude.net> <39b5b475-41c9-4e69-a648-a84deeff50e9@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2012 23:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="0e44dd4a3c4e0a6e83a86f947fb780ae"; logging-data="28837"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1++GwYtYsTnzZ981Ms6tNBRIHeZtIeyris=" User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LflaK286IHA3dxMuOf3RmjN1bM8= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2012-10-20T23:08:30+00:00 List-Id: On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:57:48 +0200, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) wrote: > Le Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:28:59 +0200, Brian Drummond > a écrit: >> One point that occurs while writing this : a lot of Ada textbooks >> approach Ada purely from a top down design model, that looks highly >> formal and very dated to either a hobbyist, or someone schooled in >> agile programming, refactoring, and so on. > > It's already good at refactoring. Exactly. Though how is a C-taught programmer, schooled in Agile and (cough) "test-driven development", going to appreciate that before he tries Ada? > “remember the tones of stupid or vicious errors you had to fix during > days of testing after you moved that from here to there? Ada would had > caught near to all the error in in a second.”. When testing is so many > time used to workaround the lack of type checking (should really be a > fundamental basis to everyone) and proper dependency declaration between > modules, …. A better way of making my point. >You see, it needs just two sentences. Well, it also needs programmers to READ those two sentences... Where can we put them? - Brian