From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.82.195 with SMTP id k3mr579128pay.23.1345782186499;
        Thu, 23 Aug 2012 21:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 a8ni22748124pbd.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.arglkargh.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 23:22:58 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <k16vj7$nn2$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
   <k01amo$jio$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com>
 <k04a26$doi$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wius1gdbka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k0bubm$loe$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wi0fliuoka8ora@aspire.local>
 <44bb5c96-a158-41c1-8e7d-ae83b2c0aca1@googlegroups.com>
 <1mchat48i3fos.1ksbz02nuzf5f$.dlg@40tude.net> <k0ei0u$214$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <rznvpohy5adk$.1of2k7nklsaam.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502b832f$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <vqx5pu5yd4m7.jlystys02zcx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bc4df$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <sgy28ka2rw0a.119txios2lu0g$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c08f9$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <k1133n$s51$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <5034d558$0$6581$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <k13kh1$fh9$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <5035e241$0$6584$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1345782184 24290 69.95.181.76 (24 Aug 2012 04:23:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 04:23:04 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2012-08-23T23:22:58-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Georg Bauhaus" <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> wrote in message 
news:5035e241$0$6584$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net...
> On 22.08.12 23:55, Randy Brukardt wrote:
...
>>> First, HTML is inflexible in that you cannot choose a natural
>>> vocabulary for car information.
>>
>> Who gives a f*** about a "vocabulary"?
>
> Ada software engineers are asked to use a domain specific vocabulary
> in their program (which here is about car status). The status web
> server engineers can be asked the same when producing tagged text
> they then delegate to the web guys who write the XSLT to be run in
> the browser. I think Vasiliy already indicated how. And yes, it has
> to come from somewhere.

You need to go to "Overengineering Anonymous". The original problem 
statement was "send to a browser", which means HTML has to be present 
somewhere. All the rest of this is huge amounts of overkill.

                       Randy.