From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.129.81 with SMTP id n17mr1792005bks.3.1345590713713;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.88.195 with SMTP id bi3mr37235wib.3.1345590713257;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 16:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 m12ni124286bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!7no34250871wig.0!news-out.google.com!q11ni249382631wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!195.62.100.242.MISMATCH!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 18:11:46 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <k114jm$t1o$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
   <ak8h9w7770bx$.ncrikznng6v3$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <pstv4iafyysv$.1mq6dicsj9my0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <mhbnq53dwqt2.r7w4k1ptmxf1$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
 <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <ciztlfv7tfhf$.taw9f39y1oa4$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net>
 <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033b4d8$0$6571$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <gpcuiu6p58gd$.118wuad9bdmvo$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5033ff28$0$6185$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1345590710 29752 69.95.181.76 (21 Aug 2012 23:11:50 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 23:11:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2012-08-21T18:11:46-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Pascal Obry" <pascal@obry.net> wrote in message 
news:5033ff28$0$6185$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr...
...
> Maybe you don't like XML, but you just can't say that this is not an
> important point. At least the current situation prove you that you are
> 100% wrong, look around there is XML everywhere.

...which is probably why "modern" computing is unmitigated rubbish. Hardly 
anything that has happened since the 1990s is an improvement - most of it is 
dubious eye candy while simulateously providing multiple new ways to lose 
your identity and ultimately freedom. Bah humbug.

                                          Randy.