From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.204.129.81 with SMTP id n17mr1788193bks.3.1345589177247;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.88.195 with SMTP id bi3mr30888wib.3.1345589176706;
        Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 m12ni124235bkm.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!7no34210831wig.0!news-out.google.com!q11ni249084915wiw.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!78.46.240.70.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:46:12 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <k1133n$s51$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
   <502005b6$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <op.wim0pbprka8ora@aspire.local>
 <50203ca2$0$9512$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <502040c0$0$9510$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
 <k01amo$jio$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <50677fa2-7f82-4ccc-8c56-161bf67fefe1@googlegroups.com>
 <k04a26$doi$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wius1gdbka8ora@aspire.local>
 <k0bubm$loe$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wi0fliuoka8ora@aspire.local>
 <44bb5c96-a158-41c1-8e7d-ae83b2c0aca1@googlegroups.com>
 <1mchat48i3fos.1ksbz02nuzf5f$.dlg@40tude.net> <k0ei0u$214$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <rznvpohy5adk$.1of2k7nklsaam.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502b832f$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <vqx5pu5yd4m7.jlystys02zcx$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bc4df$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <sgy28ka2rw0a.119txios2lu0g$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <502c08f9$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1345589176 28833 69.95.181.76 (21 Aug 2012 22:46:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 22:46:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2012-08-21T17:46:12-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Georg Bauhaus" <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> wrote in message 
news:502c08f9$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net...
> On 15.08.12 20:53, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> And
>> how these [unsubstantiated claim] justify any application of XML even if 
>> per
>> some miracle they happened true?
>
> I'll answer in another post, but here is a business idea
> involving cars, XML, and smart phones.
...
> Technically, then, have the car have a small web server
> (perhaps smaller than AWS), and have the server send an XML
> document to the owner's mobile phone. Have that triggered
> by web  requests. Add information in caches as necessary.

Sure sounds wildly complicated, when all that is needed is to send 
appropriate HTML pages to the phone's browser. HTML is easy to create by a 
program (just as easy as XML, as they're related after all). It might make 
sense to use XML to send data to an app, but that's clearly the hard way to 
do things.

                                Randy.