From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a83584e000bc28fa X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.85.231 with SMTP id k7mr2333147paz.38.1345488391856; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Path: p10ni114309906pbh.1!nntp.google.com!news.glorb.com!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ada lapack Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:46:29 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <12f929e9-eea3-4dc9-b10d-71e4f5732e0d@googlegroups.com> <12606f3f-aec1-489c-8325-18e13007b6a6@googlegroups.com> <11959826-e12e-4455-b9d9-1ac4dcaf2952@googlegroups.com> <3bdbf14a-52ff-4b72-9e7b-42b543538959@googlegroups.com> <5865849c-3897-4be5-8d54-1de2e1acc3a7@googlegroups.com> <781001a0-3a99-40ac-bc5b-c8337124b29b@googlegroups.com> <698e8722-4e47-4aff-836a-9ca36e6207bf@googlegroups.com> <51bf0895-3e92-42e9-b99d-5bc03bd99d85@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nma@12000.org NNTP-Posting-Host: 9ii5QNw33OfeoTzEH8w9ug.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-08-20T13:46:29-05:00 List-Id: On 8/20/2012 9:57 AM, Simon Wright wrote: > > What I meant was that the SF project that Leo has already set up for > Ada_Lapack would be even better if it had the source code in source > control, rather than just as an archive. If I was enrolled as a > developer on the project I could do that, if Leo wanted. I just wanted to say that is not important which project at SF the code goes or even which snap shot is used, as long as there is one set of code base. I think the changes I made to make the binding one package instead of 4 makes it easier to use Lapack but these are not critical changes to the API itself. I used the original Ada Blas and Lapack code. Did not write anything myself. It will be better for Ada if Lapack and Blas code was in source control and everyone knows which source to use. That is the important thing. --Nasser