From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,7684e927a2475d0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!newsfeed.cw.net!cw.net!news-FFM2.ecrc.de!noris.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.arcor.de!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other
 licenses related questions...
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
Organization: cbb software GmbH
References: <e7h852$7h0$1@online.de> <jccum3-trl.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com>
 <e7j2i7$4vl$1@online.de> <s8zmg2rdp4.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <449d2a28$0$11075$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <k7ejxer8x4.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <449d5c03$0$11074$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net>
 <rntq9299uobutv707i07gqi87oeba18e63@4ax.com> <e7k9j4$al8$3@online.de>
 <w1Ang.1115$NP4.742@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net>
 <6sbqsh6jv7.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
 <n1nu92praahokl5ev7ih75j9f2t09hugt8@4ax.com>
 <wvbrac7zhxel.fsf@techra25.norway.sun.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:00:19 +0200
Message-ID: <jzwfdgtphm9z.tsu1fqt8pa75.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Jun 2006 10:00:20 MEST
NNTP-Posting-Host: b83215b6.newsread2.arcor-online.net
X-Trace: 
 DXC=MgOIdD<WVc6h^:`T28h7Q<Q5U85hF6f;4jW\KbG]kaM8GSi?jHD8GO0h3XeHgmLQU3[6LHn;2LCV>7enW;^6ZC`4IXm65S@:3>?
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5052
Date: 2006-06-27T10:00:20+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 27 Jun 2006 09:26:26 +0200, Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen wrote:

> Completely agree. The current licensing model of GNAT does very little
> to promote the growth of Ada, but brings a lot of FUD. Once again we
> are shooting ourselves in the foot. 

Are you an ACT employee? (:-)) Otherwise, agree, probably they do
themselves...

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de