From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,859116256d0a7bc2
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.224.180.205 with SMTP id bv13mr11588012qab.8.1343789815253;
        Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.37 with SMTP id e5mr2953838paz.31.1343789444696;
        Tue, 31 Jul 2012 19:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 a15ni13561295qag.0!nntp.google.com!r1no8657436qas.0!news-out.google.com!g9ni9632822pbo.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: basic question on nested packages
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2012 00:27:31 -0500
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <juvt8d$ijs$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <juvlur$5du$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Reply-To: nma@12000.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9ii5QNw33OfeoTzEH8w9ug.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-07-28T00:27:31-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 7/27/2012 10:22 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:

>
> What I think would be better is to have ONE lapack package and
> with the above packages as nested packages.

ref (me)

I think may be I need to use 'child packages', not 'nested pacakges',
but not sure yet.

I am doing a crash course now reading an ada book to learn more
the difference between these and which one to use....

--Nasser