From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,735c710b5e547bad
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.77.41 with SMTP id p9mr1130777paw.8.1343259563729;
        Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 p10ni52925434pbh.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 puzzle
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:39:20 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <juq03a$aph$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <1arp60wtxes8h$.1qs6bt732ztgp.dlg@40tude.net>
 <030cde76-7435-405d-9f12-ac7f730ecab8@googlegroups.com>
 <1f9q6vk5z2r3t$.1hayo9rmxfwu7$.dlg@40tude.net> <ju8atj$734$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <wd9m63dfb4hn.1feik6xrauuel$.dlg@40tude.net> <juafd9$fa5$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1agfifqlayl3y.1bp09z5i37ewk$.dlg@40tude.net> <jucrlq$d2c$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <1nnq1oprn6h4f.1s5myl3oupdds$.dlg@40tude.net> <jul1rf$3rn$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <57ed1bca-b503-492c-a3b1-012369484e93@googlegroups.com>
 <e3lpckmcck22$.eqnl4sn38ezy$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1343259562 11057 69.95.181.76 (25 Jul 2012 23:39:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 23:39:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Received-Bytes: 2237
Date: 2012-07-25T18:39:20-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> wrote in message 
news:e3lpckmcck22$.eqnl4sn38ezy$.dlg@40tude.net...
> On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:23:50 -0700 (PDT), Adam Beneschan wrote:
...
> I repeat it again. It is not about any concrete example. It is about the
> principle that constructing function would allow writing an aggregate for 
> a
> derived type.

Fine. Then report the *principle* to Ada-Comment, along with some examples 
where it doesn't work. As I said, we're not spending our time trolling for 
language bugs -- someone has to report them. And I'm not doing it for other 
anymore. If you don't care enough to report things to Ada-Comment, then we 
(the ARG) shouldn't care enough to look at changing them. We've got plenty 
of hard problems to work on as it is (and I'm sure will get more).

                                         Randy.