"Markus Sch�pflin" <no.spam@spam.spam> wrote in message 
news:ju8u7t$kh9$1@speranza.aioe.org...
...
> What surprises me is that the objects with address 08077F90 and 08077FA0 
> are finalized twice in the second case. I'm aware that this is allowed but 
> nevertheless I'm wondering why it happens here, because up to now I was 
> thinking that only by explicitly calling finalize() or when tasks are 
> involved that this actually happens. Should I consider this a regression 
> in gcc and report it as such?

Those look like the temporary objects to me (since the array X should be 
finalized last, and these aren't that). And I don't know of any reason that 
temporaries should be finalized twice (or any reason that an implementer 
would want to do that). I think it is a bug, and you ought to report it as 
such.

                                                  Randy.