From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,27db9c02e8783e58
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.180.107.167 with SMTP id hd7mr74538wib.0.1343341861741;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 15:31:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.138.146 with SMTP id a18mr1314022qau.6.1343312950438;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.72.165 with SMTP id e5mr1607819pav.4.1343312950200;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 ge7ni81112325wib.0!nntp.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-C.news.volia.net!y14no8467254qaj.0!news-out.google.com!a15ni113198934qag.0!nntp.google.com!q21no48509qas.0!news-out.google.com!b9ni64781483pbl.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!94.232.116.13.MISMATCH!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.antakira.com!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Markus_Sch=F6pflin?= <no.spam@spam.spam>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Differences in finalization of controlled objects between gcc
 4.6 and gcc 4.7
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 15:59:14 +0200
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <ju93rg$43j$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <ju8u7t$kh9$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <50080f7b$0$9525$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: MdpKeRr+sx3LK7JQiK5aNw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1;
 rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-07-19T15:59:14+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Am 19.07.2012 15:45, schrieb Georg Bauhaus:
> On 19.07.12 14:23, Markus Sch�pflin wrote:
>> Is there a way to have the objects created in place directly in the array?
>
> Can you make the type limited?

No, I need to be able to copy them around. But IMHO that shouldn't make a 
difference in this case, the compiler should be able to figure out that it can 
construct the objects in place, shouldn't it?

Surprisingly (at least for me) it *does* make a difference when I define T as

      type T is new ADA.FINALIZATION.LIMITED_CONTROLLED with null record;

Then the output looks like this with both versions of gcc:

 > ./test_ctrl
BFBE03D4: I
BFBE03D8: I
BFBE03D8: F
BFBE03D4: F

Regards,
Markus