From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,973b2ff14841b514 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.219.170 with SMTP id pp10mr9511363pbc.1.1341489736695; Thu, 05 Jul 2012 05:02:16 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni10941pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: what to use in place of old gnatbl in newer GNAT ? Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 07:02:13 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: Reply-To: nma@12000.org NNTP-Posting-Host: pfl4qxtMf5hoqRBBsHQhPQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-07-05T07:02:13-05:00 List-Id: On 7/5/2012 6:41 AM, Simon Wright wrote: > Simon Wright writes: > Actually, aside from the spelling, this is correct; the first number is > passed by Ada as mode in, so the fact that the Fortran changes it has no > effect on the value seen by Ada after the call. > fyi; I put the log file of the result of all the Lapack-Ada interface tests here http://12000.org/my_notes/ada/ada_lapack_interface_tests.txt I removed 2 tests from the Makefile which do not build. The above using GNAT 2012 on linux, with Lapack 77 binding. Will do full documenations later once I get to look more into this. --Nasser