From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef08d45f11a6d21 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.227.67 with SMTP id ry3mr14404609pbc.8.1340751627699; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni23581pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin3!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: max CPU load recommended Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:00:22 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.20.201.198 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1340751626 49486 184.20.201.198 (26 Jun 2012 23:00:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:00:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-06-26T16:00:22-07:00 List-Id: On 06/26/2012 03:14 PM, Vinzent Hoefler wrote: > Gerd wrote: >> >> What is a recommended value for maximum CPU load for safety systems? > > 69.3%, according to the formula. ;) Most of the critical embedded systems I've worked on said 50%, to allow for future enhancements. And none of them ever used that reserved 50%; when they came to do enhancements, they upgraded the processor(s), and required that we keep 50% for future enhancements. -- Jeff Carter "People called Romanes, they go the house?" Monty Python's Life of Brian 79 --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---