From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d65138770e3daae3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.190.104 with SMTP id gp8mr18086976pbc.4.1340750608797;
        Tue, 26 Jun 2012 15:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 l9ni23531pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Refactoring for error: cannot inline "X" (forward instance within
 enclosing body)
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 17:43:24 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <jsdduf$har$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: 
 <7a18bc7e-2541-46f9-9d92-65d87fed06e6@googlegroups.com><jsaf89$9a9$1@dont-email.me><d651e7c9-e091-42a9-b56b-2502e6fab091@googlegroups.com>
 <jsc3pr$iap$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1340750607 17755 69.95.181.76 (26 Jun 2012 22:43:27 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 22:43:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2012-06-26T17:43:24-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Brian Drummond" <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk> wrote in message 
news:jsc3pr$iap$1@dont-email.me...
...
> Georg points out a workaround : -gnatN performs inline expansion in the
> Gnat front end, which CAN see the package body while compiling the outer
> module. It is not clear to me : is that allowed by the LRM, or is Gnat
> being a little naughty here?

Inline_Always is a GNAT invention, so it can do what it wants. And it is 
always OK for an Ada compiler to inline (whether or not a pragma or aspect 
or command line option is given.)

                                Randy.