From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,1de1981df403322c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-12 05:05:03 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!teaser.fr!oleane.net!oleane!nnrp.oleane.net!skymaster!nobody From: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: New limited range type? Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:22:50 +0100 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: <1068220677.950551@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1068224385.790621@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr X-Trace: s1.read.news.oleane.net 1068642110 8998 195.25.228.57 (12 Nov 2003 13:01:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:01:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2414 Date: 2003-11-12T09:22:50+01:00 List-Id: "Hyman Rosen" a �crit dans le message de news:1068224385.790621@master.nyc.kbcfp.com... > Martin Dowie wrote: > > Standard operator precedent rules should apply - I can't see > > that as being outragous? > > But Ada doesn't define operator evaluation order, so this would > be a major change in the language. (Not a bad one, just big.) > Nope. Ada does not define "evaluation order", but it does define associativity. A+B-C is definitely (A+B) - C However, Ada does not define whether (A+B) is evaluated before or after C. -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr