From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cfdc446e6bbe8ba X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.204.132.81 with SMTP id a17mr1079258bkt.4.1339813166049; Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Path: e27ni53213bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!newsfeed.utanet.at!newsfeed.tele2net.at!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: BrianG Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Listing currently maintained libraries for Ada Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:19:23 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8462b850-a302-4796-a034-92ce8914be08@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 02:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="sUrC0xRwf73oxX3tf6U0cw"; logging-data="15652"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+iMzjd0nAuhevlY1VsBeQs" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/3.1.16 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:PkOAERaMDNPdIcjLRWBOJI/prPw= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-06-15T22:19:23-04:00 List-Id: On 06/15/2012 05:41 PM, Robert A Duff wrote: > i3text@gmail.com writes: > >> On Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:37:59 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey Carter wrote: >>> A mature library will be useful but see no >>> "maintenance activity" because there is no longer anything to change. >> >> This is actually the first time I've seen someone take this position, >> so I've been thinking about when it might be true. > > That's kind of a sad commentary on the state of the art, isn't it? > If you're not constantly fixing bugs (and adding new ones?) people > consider your project "dead". > Indirectly related quote: "If there are no bugs in your current software your customer might not feel inclined to pay for the new version. " (from, of all places, comp.software-eng - presented as an actual position of the poster) -- --- BrianG 000 @[Google's email domain] .com