From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6cfdc446e6bbe8ba
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.196.232 with SMTP id ip8mr4934999pbc.6.1339738685282;
        Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:38:05 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni52476pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Listing currently maintained libraries for Ada
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:37:59 -0700
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net
Message-ID: <jrehnr$27nn$1@adenine.netfront.net>
References: <d36fe271-b6de-489b-9f4d-e6994773445e@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.20.201.198
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1339738684 73463 184.20.201.198 (15 Jun 2012
 05:38:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 05:38:04 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
In-Reply-To: <d36fe271-b6de-489b-9f4d-e6994773445e@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-06-14T22:37:59-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 06/14/2012 08:51 PM, i3text@gmail.com wrote:
> When searching for Ada libraries, it is discouraging to find mostly dead
> links or links to dead projects. So I decided to make a list of all the
> libraries I could find that seem to be still active projects. To be listed, a
> library must have seen some maintenance activity within the last year. I
> generally ingored things that are already part of the GNAT distribution.
>
> At first, I wanted to list just libraries of production quality, but I
> figured I couldn't reliably evaluate that. So, a lot of the things here are
> alpha quality. Of course, there are libraries that haven't seen any work for
> several years but still get downloaded a lot. But I wanted a listing of
> libraries where I could reasonably expect help and bug-fixes.
>
> Do you know any I've missed?

Your criteria are somewhat strange. A mature library will be useful but see no 
"maintenance activity" because there is no longer anything to change. For 
example, the PragmAda Reusable Components are very much alive and supported, but 
have not been changed recently:

http://pragmada.x10hosting.com/

-- 
Jeff Carter
"English bed-wetting types."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
15

--- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---