From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,96513ac1263dc3e X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.196.232 with SMTP id ip8mr3875043pbc.6.1339285640447; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni35386pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Clean out those dead links Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:47:16 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <6223f724-366c-496a-a8ae-3954bb788612@t1g2000pbl.googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nma@12000.org NNTP-Posting-Host: 3C623TNz/HPIQTEl9vi8rg.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-06-09T18:47:16-05:00 List-Id: On 6/9/2012 5:11 PM, wrp wrote: > > So, if you have an Ada page, why don't you spend a few minutes to > clean it up? > Agree. But it does really take more than few minutes. When I cleaned the links on my Ada links page: http://12000.org/my_notes/ada/original_web_page.htm I record the time that the link was check to be valid, and if the link is broken, search the net for where the link gone (this takes time) so that to update it, and there is no alternative link to be found, then remove it. I remember it took me few long hrs to do the whole page. I guess many are busy with work and family, not everyone has time. But your point is valid. I have the same experience. This reminds me, I need to go check my Ada links now. I see I last validated them in 2005 :) --Nasser