From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d5b211b0c1ffcf3e X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.204.149.210 with SMTP id u18mr2372386bkv.1.1339258165351; Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:09:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: e27ni31681bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!news.ecp.fr!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Practicalities of Ada for app development Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 16:09:20 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: Lf0Nl3CcQzx+ocHx9cmuGg.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Date: 2012-06-09T16:09:20+00:00 List-Id: >Ada is lousy for text/string manipulation. Although I'm an Ada >enthusiast, I cannot think of a worse language in this regard. Speak for yourself. I find it easy to do text processing in Ada, given a few home-grown library routines. But having written compilers in both Fortran and COBOL, perhaps my standards aren't up to your level.