From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr405038pbc.0.1338430668610;
        Wed, 30 May 2012 19:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni2042pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BrianG <me@null.email>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 22:17:45 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <jq6kcb$br0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <4fc4fd1c$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <3MDSK83K41059.2087037037@reece.net.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 02:17:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="5MNoRlpIAhOS/jy0qxZerw";
	logging-data="12128"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KkezPBli93iUua6gR1WsL"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/3.1.16
In-Reply-To: <3MDSK83K41059.2087037037@reece.net.au>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DcaEig5aNVxwT/QPC+TSZV5Btpk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-05-30T22:17:45-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 05/29/2012 05:00 PM, Kulin wrote:
> Thomas L�cke<thomas@12boo.net>  wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2012 08:34 PM, Nomen Nescio wrote:
>> The GPL serves its purpose, as do all the other open source licenses.
>
> I don't agree. The GPL is not about software licensing. It's about socialist
> policy and an agenda that any professional programmer would reject.
>

Somehow, I suspect the "professional programmers" at AdaCore, RedHat, 
Canonical, etc. would disagree with your "any".

I have no opinion on this subject, but I _am_ a "professional 
programmer".  I don't recall getting the memo telling me that this must 
be my opinion, nor the memo informing me that you were appointed to 
provide me with my opinion.

 >                     ... and anyone who suggests otherwise is a liar.

Unless you can prove conscious intent, that statement is patently false 
(no matter what your point was, or what others actually said/suggested).

-- 
---
BrianG
000
@[Google's email domain]
.com