From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.195.131 with SMTP id ie3mr8745850pbc.8.1338278320719; Tue, 29 May 2012 00:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Path: pr3ni61525pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!feed-C.news.volia.net!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.ecp.fr!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!hugin.jacob-sparre.dk!news.thorslund.org!pnx.dk!not-for-mail From: Gustaf Thorslund Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2 Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 09:58:40 +0200 Organization: gustaf.thorslund.org Message-ID: References: <1962744539359908272.324914rm-host.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: katthult.thorslund.org 1338278319 18855 ::1 (29 May 2012 07:58:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@thorslund.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 07:58:39 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-05-29T09:58:40+02:00 List-Id: On 2012-05-28 20:34, Nomen Nescio wrote: > Freedom means the absence of restriction, I don't disagree with restrictions in freedom. >> discussions will necessarily lead into morass. > > Only for liars and politicians. Everyone else agrees what freedom means. Then lets find out who of us is the liar and who is the politician. >> The GPL is openly stating the restrictions it imposes on the uses of a >> work > > Bzzt! There's your answer, it's not free. > >> (tit for tat at the source level). The more permissive licenses do that, >> too (for example, "keep us out of it"). The sets of "may (not) do this or >> that" terms are different. > > The MIT license doesn't seem to have any restrictions at all. The BSD > license seems to say "don't say you wrote this" but otherwise you can do > what you want. They're saying you shouldn't lie or plagiarize, but that is > not a restriction. They could also say not to rob or murder, but all of > those things are already agreed by society to be wrong and they have nothing > to do with the software itself, so I think the (new) BSD and MIT licenses > are really free software licenses. There are others. Without closing your eyes, please read: http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php --> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. --> I'd say there are a number of restrictions here. To me it makes sense to have them there to give the original developer some kind of freedom in the rest of his life. But for anyone extending the work it could be seen as a restriction. Regards, Gustaf -- http://gustaf.thorslund.org