From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6deb3e1ddefb099 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.204.157.134 with SMTP id b6mr1583429bkx.5.1337368385436; Fri, 18 May 2012 12:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Path: e27ni11383bkw.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsgate.cuhk.edu.hk!news.netfront.net!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Companies Only Offering Ada-95 Compilers Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 12:13:00 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 184.20.60.36 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: adenine.netfront.net 1337368384 53098 184.20.60.36 (18 May 2012 19:13:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@netfront.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 19:13:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-05-18T12:13:00-07:00 List-Id: On 05/18/2012 06:40 AM, Robert A Duff wrote: > Jeffrey Carter writes: >> >> So to recap, of 7 compilers, 3 implement the complete current standard >> (1 of them also implements the draft standard for the next version). 5 >> years after publication of the standard, that's not very encouraging. > > Why do you say so? It's much better than the situation in the C world. I compare it to the situation in 2000, 5 yrs after publication of the Ada-95 standard, when everyone had implemented Ada 95 for several yrs. -- Jeff Carter "We use a large, vibrating egg." Annie Hall 44 --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net/ - Complaints to news@netfront.net ---