From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6deb3e1ddefb099 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.223.40 with SMTP id qr8mr13714781pbc.0.1337342740371; Fri, 18 May 2012 05:05:40 -0700 (PDT) Path: pr3ni1076pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Companies Only Offering Ada-95 Compilers Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 07:05:34 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <0315672b-2d06-4f5e-b097-753f7c40e870@googlegroups.com> Reply-To: nma@12000.org NNTP-Posting-Host: JFgm6aMVwmC/YQNQyUTYRQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-05-18T07:05:34-05:00 List-Id: On 5/18/2012 6:11 AM, Lucretia wrote: > > And only 1 is available to the general public, RR's is affordable though. > > Luke. well, we (i.e the general public :) only really need ONE good, open source Ada compiler any way. right? Look at Java for example, oracle's Java is all there is really. In open source, it is openJDK. That is the Java that everyone uses. That is what I use on Linux and windows. I do not see a problem with having just one Ada compiler. As long as it is open, and free to use, and is good. What is needed for Ada, is more Ada libraries, not more Ada compilers. --Nasser