From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6deb3e1ddefb099 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.238.67 with SMTP id vi3mr4585681pbc.6.1337314662743; Thu, 17 May 2012 21:17:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: pr3ni12673pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Companies Only Offering Ada-95 Compilers Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 23:17:38 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1337314661 29567 69.95.181.76 (18 May 2012 04:17:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 04:17:41 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Date: 2012-05-17T23:17:38-05:00 List-Id: "Jeffrey Carter" wrote in message news:jp1k2n$ouo$1@adenine.netfront.net... > From what I can tell, the following companies only offer Ada-95 compilers: > > DDCI > Greenhills > RR Software Our (RRS) current beta compiler supports a handful of Ada 2005, and the complete Ada 2005 syntax. Not quite just Ada 95. > The following offer compilers for current Ada: > > AdaCore > Irvine Not sure if Irvine supports any Ada 2012, which is "current Ada" in my mind. > For the following, I can't tell: > > Atego > IBM/Rational The Rational compiler supports at least most of Ada 2005 (there was an announcement to this effect a couple years ago). No idea about Ada 2012. My understanding was that Atego was Ada 95-only, but that may be old information. > Have I missed anyone? Corrections are welcome. I'm trying to determine the > extent of support for current Ada by compiler vendors. Randy.