From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,8295d69277f1696c X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.220.230 with SMTP id pz6mr350793pbc.3.1337213715537; Wed, 16 May 2012 17:15:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: pr3ni7070pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.newsland.it!newsfeed.x-privat.org!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: understanding runtime support Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 19:15:07 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <25378735.47.1337066797139.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbvx4> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1337213712 32027 69.95.181.76 (17 May 2012 00:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 00:15:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Date: 2012-05-16T19:15:07-05:00 List-Id: wrote in message news:jp0kbf$gvo$1@speranza.aioe.org... >> If you insist on programming the bare metal in Ada ... >> ... >> The Ada run-time did not support tasking or memory deallocation, and >> could >> not propagate exceptions beyond the frame that raised them. > RR Software had a full Ada 83 that ran on DOS. I don't recall DOS as > being all that far from bare metal - it was basically I/O. And I'd be > curious, Randy, what Windows OS features were needed for, say, Ada 95. We use the Windows heap for memory management, rather than our own design that we used on MS-DOS. Otherwise, the compiler is basically the same (we don't use threads, for instance, so our tasking could easily run on bare metal; similarly, we don't use Windows exceptions, mainly because I couldn't find any documentation in 1998 as to how they are handled in code). So the Windows services used are mostly memory management and I/O. Randy.