From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,81bb2ce65a3240c3
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr7487363pbc.2.1337027050604;
        Mon, 14 May 2012 13:24:10 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 pr3ni26107pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!news.musoftware.de!wum.musoftware.de!feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!hugin.jacob-sparre.dk!news.thorslund.org!pnx.dk!not-for-mail
From: Gustaf Thorslund <gustaf@thorslund.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: What would you like in Ada202X?
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 22:24:12 +0200
Organization: gustaf.thorslund.org
Message-ID: <jorpl9$elu$1@katthult.thorslund.org>
References: <3637793.35.1335340026327.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynfi5>
 <r9nolai9rkz8$.1j95yhyvqvm3o.dlg@40tude.net>
 <jofqoo$mrj$1@katthult.thorslund.org>
 <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205141119370.13722@medsec1.medien.uni-weimar.de>
 <qtxntlbkkt94$.vdjdpliabtdo$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fb10423$0$6628$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
 <77mwuc5z6kdu.14qt5gh4wmt7i$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <4fb129b0$0$6630$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: katthult.thorslund.org 1337027049 15038 ::1 (14 May 2012 20:24:09
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@thorslund.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 20:24:09 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
In-Reply-To: <4fb129b0$0$6630$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-05-14T22:24:12+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2012-05-14 17:50, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
> On 14.05.12 15:40, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 May 2012 15:09:54 +0200, Georg Bauhaus wrote:
>>
>>> On 14.05.12 14:19, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
>>
>>>> P.S. I wonder why people keep on calling that thing loop. It has little to
>>>> do with iterations. It is a set of paramerized sequences of statements
>>>> executed asynchronously with a synchronization point at the end. The syntax
>>>> should reflect that.
>>>
>>> For a start,
>>>
>>>    for all I in 1 .. 10 do
>>>      { stmt }
>>>    end do all;
>>
>> Yes, I also thought about that, but it still looks much like a loop.
>
>     with all I in 1 .. 10 do
>        { stmt }
>     end do all;
>
> That's a non-loop indicator up front.

Looks good to me. Since there is no "parallel" involved it also doesn't 
give the impression everything will actually run in parallel. I think 
this is good. I suppose somewhere there need to be a way to set max 
concurrency.

Regards,
Gustaf
-- 
http://gustaf.thorslund.org