From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fed2e7871ca258cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-21 21:33:57 PST Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 00:34:13 -0500 From: johnmatthews@nospam.mac.com (John B. Matthews) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: List Container Strawman 1.4 Message-ID: References: <9vbc89$eb6li$2@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <9ve8jn$esilp$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <9viq4m$fjbkr$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <9vvpc9$gud$1@nh.pace.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.3.6 NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.24.79.1 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.24.79.1 X-Trace: 21 Dec 2001 21:33:54 -0800, 10.24.79.1 Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!mvb.saic.com!cpns1.saic.com!johnmatthews Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18241 Date: 2001-12-22T00:34:13-05:00 List-Id: In article , Ted Dennison wrote: > In article , Marin David Condic says... > > > >"Ted Dennison" wrote in message > >news:mnLU7.7098$XC5.9248@www.newsranger.com... .. > >"Components" need not all be "Containers". Maybe we could lose the whole > >"Containers" part and make a flatter tree? Something like > >ACL.Lists.Unbounded? > > Yes, that's what I was talking about (minus the adding of unrelated stuff, of > course). > > >It could also be over-used - Access Control Lists? I like it for being > > I keep thinking "Anterior Cruia Ligament"(sp?), which is a really nasty sports > injury. Anterior cruciate ligament: one of a pair of ligaments that form a cross in the knee joint to provide front/back stability. > >One of my compatriots in another existence liked to name all the company > >laptops and computers after Tequilas. Trademark infringements aside, I'd go > >for that. Especially when it came time to do some "research" to find a name > >for a new machine. :-) > > If we make it scotch instead, we could start with Dewar. :-) I'll drink to that! (Oh dear, now I'm off topic _and_ drunk:-) John ---- http://homepage.mac.com/johnmatthews > --- > T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html > > No trees were killed in the sending of this message. > However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.