From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2573df63ff37c586
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.125.233 with SMTP id mt9mr5024814pbb.5.1336114866272;
        Fri, 04 May 2012 00:01:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 pr3ni2147pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.tornevall.net!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: News on the AdaIC website? (Was: Re: Adaforge?)
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 02:01:02 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <jnvurh$k95$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: 
 <10872380.887.1335622497447.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbbfr18>
 <20524276.2208.1335953540520.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbqq1>
 <jnshns$vkv$1@munin.nbi.dk> <8762cd9yc8.fsf_-_@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <jnv0ef$li8$1@munin.nbi.dk> <op.wdq7jczoule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1336114865 20773 69.95.181.76 (4 May 2012 07:01:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 07:01:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2012-05-04T02:01:02-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> wrote in message 
news:op.wdq7jczoule2fv@douda-yannick...
Le Fri, 04 May 2012 00:22:00 +0200, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com>
a �crit:

...
>> That's part of the trouble, we've never been able to get clear agreement
>> within the ARA what should be allowed and what should not. There is a
>> legitimate concern about publisizing too much for non-members, which 
>> reduces
>> the value of ARA membership to those companies. When Ann and I were in
>> charge, we tended to report all member news, but only significant news
>> events for other companies and organizations (that is, no "minor updates" 
>> or
>> "third call for papers"). I think that's still pretty much the case.
>
>What about licensing? Any restrictions there?

Huh? Licensing for news? I'd hope that any news people send out is for the 
general public to see without restriction; I can't imagine wanting it 
otherwise.

                     Randy.