From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b4945ea154eefb5f
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.125.233 with SMTP id mt9mr254390pbb.5.1334697593518;
        Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni67943pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Building gnat-gpl-2011-avr-windows from scratch in GPS
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:19:53 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <jmkmpo$9g7$1@dont-email.me>
References: <20256137.216.1333941508115.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbpp14>
	<m24nstgyhw.fsf@pushface.org>
	<11114179.137.1334181998473.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynej18>
	<20a04e0a-04b9-4bc9-bb94-04ba35e451d0@f27g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>
	<jmk7gb$9i0$1@dont-email.me> <m2ty0ijgxq.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:19:53 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="DkTdSjxOCm6DqG+Uf7eArg";
	logging-data="9735"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/7Bsi/sFc4ncHTWKj1t2uGRFCUchQOGic="
User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT
	30dc37b master)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:1AjpBhR0cLwOOFI3OuM7NPkeaoA=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-04-17T21:19:53+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:29:05 +0100, Simon Wright wrote:

> Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk> writes:
> 
>> I have also added a switch and modified the example along the lines :
>>     Sw : Boolean renames MCU.PinB_Bits(1);
>> ...
>>     MCU.DDRB_Bits := (1 => DD_Input, others => DD_Output);
>> ...
>>         LED <= not Sw;
>> and the fact that it works as expected suggests to me that the GCC4.5
>> bug with renamed registers has been fixed.
> 
> Is that http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46192 ? If so, it's
> certainly fixed in 4.7.0 and should be in 4.5, 4.6 too (releases after
> 21 January 2012; SVN revisions 18336[567]).

That's the one. Glad it's fixed!

- Brian