From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c733905936c6b6b0,start X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.202.37 with SMTP id kf5mr6793706pbc.7.1334485668963; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 03:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Path: r9ni58669pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Nasser M. Abbasi" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: [OT] interesting reason why a language is considered good Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 05:27:36 -0500 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: Reply-To: nma@12000.org NNTP-Posting-Host: N5+t4XG0gAAeWWr+Wnr6QA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-04-15T05:27:36-05:00 List-Id: I thought some here might enjoy this, since I know Ada folks are more "software engineering" aware than the average on the net ;) Here is what I read: "The lack of reserved words in the language gives the programmer complete freedom to choose identifiers." The above was listed under the header of what makes this language easy, robust and well defined! (I am not going to name the language). Now, I found this to be so strange and really bizarre, as I would have thought it should be the other way round. Reserved words are a good thing. Having an identifier be called 'if' or 'then' or 'which' is supposed to be good as it gives the programmer the freedom to choose the name of the variables? I am sometimes just amazed at what I read on the net about what makes a language good. But this one tops the list. --Nasser