From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!igor!rutabaga!jls
From: jls@rutabaga.Rational.COM (Jim Showalter)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada-c++ productivity
Message-ID: <jls.668465900@rutabaga>
Date: 8 Mar 91 20:58:20 GMT
References: <1991Mar7.163106.29477@wdl1.wdl.loral.com>
Sender: news@Rational.COM
Distribution: usa
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

>Can anyone provide references which address productivity (either development
>or maintenance) utilizing an full object-oriented language (say C++) vs.
>Ada?

Oh good grief. I'm so sick of Ada being called non-object-oriented. An
Ada type is an object, as is anything with state. What you really mean
is non-inheritance-oriented.
--
***** DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed herein are my own. Duh. Like you'd
ever be able to find a company (or, for that matter, very many people) with
opinions like mine. 
                   -- "When I want your opinion, I'll beat it out of you."