From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5b3aa4bc9027f04e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!wns14feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s21.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Unconstrained Arrays
References: 
 <1a8008fb-c840-45bc-824c-d10eec9fe569@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <1a8008fb-c840-45bc-824c-d10eec9fe569@d36g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <jkDvl.615065$yE1.211920@attbi_s21>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.16.158.68
X-Complaints-To: abuse@mchsi.com
X-Trace: attbi_s21 1237254543 173.16.158.68 (Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:49:03 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:49:03 GMT
Organization: AT&T ASP.att.net
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:49:03 GMT
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5122
Date: 2009-03-17T01:49:03+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

belteshazzar wrote:
> I have a program that uses a lot of different sized arrays and passed
> into math functions. So I'm using an unconstrained array type. The
> problem that I have is that I'm not allowed to use "new" this means
> that I have to use pools (which I can't because to intantiate a pool I
> have to constrain the array type) or allocated the arrays on the
> stack. Allocating the arrays on the stack is fine, BUT it means that i
> have to use array initializers so that they remain unconstrained
> rather than becoming an anonomous contrained type that can no longer
> be passed to my math functions.

I'm not clear what you're talking about. You can pass a constrained subtype to a 
subprogram that takes a parameter of an unconstrained array type.

For example, String is an unconstrained array type. If we have

function F (S : in String) return Natural;

V : String (1 .. 10);
C : Natural;

then it's perfectly legal to call F with V as its actual parameter:

C := F (S);

> Also, and the main point of my post, I've found that I can place the
> unconstrained array inside a record with a distriminant and this seems
> to solve all our problems. We don't have to use array initialisers and
> we can get pointers to aliased objects that can be easily passed to
> the math functions.

Here is your problem. There should be no reason to pass explicit pointers to 
these functions. Your best solution is to rewrite or change your library.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Drown in a vat of whiskey. Death, where is thy sting?"
Never Give a Sucker an Even Break
106