From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5412c98a3943e746
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.235.4 with SMTP id ui4mr3539797pbc.3.1331325559530;
        Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:39:19 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 h9ni7481pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Brian Drummond <brian@shapes.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Verified compilers?
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 20:39:18 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <jjdppm$r1$2@dont-email.me>
References: <op.v91cleyiule2fv@douda-yannick> <jj3p5v$2tp$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<15276255.3865.1331124143041.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbze11>
	<jj90mm$ciq$1@munin.nbi.dk> <87d38nv4zf.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
	<jja1b4$8q1$1@dont-email.me> <CB7EF37F.1184D%yaldnif.w@blueyonder.co.uk>
	<jjd26i$k12$1@dont-email.me> <jjdmgj$sfb$1@tornado.tornevall.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 20:39:18 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="DkTdSjxOCm6DqG+Uf7eArg";
	logging-data="865"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19RyQYgQIgSJ6Rhp6M0n09/Id2bZPXBJtg="
User-Agent: Pan/0.134 (Wait for Me; GIT cb32159 master)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:m8K9o38PvMg7nDpmSx/3QYMbA6A=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2012-03-09T20:39:18+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:40:50 -0700, Jeffrey Carter wrote:

> On 03/09/2012 06:56 AM, Brian Drummond wrote:
>>
>> While it amuses me to see SPADE references so close to the surface in
>> SPARK, it does also make me question how much progress has been made in
>> formal verification in the last quarter century. Gut feel says, more
>> than AI and flying cars, but not much.
> 
> Terrafugia is actively working to certify a "roadable aircraft":
> 
> http://www.terrafugia.com/

Heh, I suppose I asked for that. But I'm not sure if that proves, or 
disproves my point!

- Brian