From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f26a27628ab2a2fe X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.204.150.90 with SMTP id x26mr640877bkv.6.1330239299722; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 22:54:59 -0800 (PST) Path: t13ni71183bkb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: help building ada with glade Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:55:00 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <66ce64dd-1428-4db1-8d0e-a4ba68f9f09d@e27g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> <1dfmw0tj24ol0.pdfi51pextgu$.dlg@40tude.net> <1rlxflx3vn7d2$.gwfur2yxe3we.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="cJo7kSTQUrCFv2/D8KKtqw"; logging-data="12739"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tU4VNW90cMMnxHtMUHT6Y" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 In-Reply-To: <1rlxflx3vn7d2$.gwfur2yxe3we.dlg@40tude.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:H3aaFBcp/dxDXBLVMo2xifuDH8U= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: 2012-02-26T07:55:00+01:00 List-Id: Le 25/02/2012 10:06, Dmitry A. Kazakov a �crit : > Do you really mean the "key-press-event"? [*] I presume you rather did > "clicked" event from a button widget. If GUI consisted of only buttons, > then you would need no GLADE to design such simple thing. Maybe it was Key_clicked, it does not change my point. > >> You may argue >> that I don't learn the intrinsics of Gtk this way, fine, but I prefer >> not to have to. > > I would argue that this nasty stuff need to be learnt in order to design > GTK applications. If you want to become an expert and do sophisticated stuff, fine. If you are a casual user who makes regular GUIs, no. I have made such applications. > Not much different from MS GUI builder, which I long ago ceased to use for > same reasons I never used GLADE. One lesson was enough. So, you didn't use it, but you know it's bad? If it's your choice, fine, but don't push that advice to others! > > But it is impossible to do due to GTK design [**]. [..] > I presume that GLADE rather uses strictly static forms [...] You didn't use it, but you think it's impossible. I used it, I did it, and I appreciated it. Once again, you are free to explain to the OP how /you/ use GTK. But please don't give advice to not use something that you didn't try yourself. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr