From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e045a5e739e2c80 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.135.231 with SMTP id pv7mr3566193pbb.8.1330119168117; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 13:32:48 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: h9ni5113pbe.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re=Fun_with_History why_wasnt_Ada83_object_oriented Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:32:43 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: <15362655.665.1330003793505.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbbox6> NNTP-Posting-Host: Lf0Nl3CcQzx+ocHx9cmuGg.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader Date: 2012-02-24T21:32:43+00:00 List-Id: > The obvious repercussion of this is that there weren't any cheap > compilers (say, in the US$50 - US$100 range) that you could run on > your PC at home, so no one could experiment with the language. Ada > essentially missed the boat in the PC revolution, and so was never The obvious lesson here is that advertising is supreme. There was in fact a $100 Ada that ran on DOS machines - I know because I bought it to try out this new language named Ada. I think the ad I saw was in Byte magazine, but it surely wasn't as much press as Lotus or Ovation(?) the never-did-exist system described in a cover article.