From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a84eaf8fb2470909 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!news.in2p3.fr!in2p3.fr!oleane.net!oleane!hunter.axlog.fr!nobody From: Jean-Pierre Rosen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada generics Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2007 10:08:32 +0100 Organization: Adalog Message-ID: References: <1166710494.869393.108730@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <17fe4xfogg7p5.1dcyc5nyc2gsl.dlg@40tude.net> <1166805696.291429.239590@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> <186qujlcx6rwl.1h6eq4mbdaa5s$.dlg@40tude.net> <1167150212.165097.289010@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com> <1qmdvus6du3xu.1n21tzgev46ia$.dlg@40tude.net> <1167246396.057028.325080@48g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> <15jxp8z1iu5fk.1oeihvavjghgg$.dlg@40tude.net> <1167327306.22163.66.camel@localhost> <1on3cinnnckc5.1rxxvjhxs5qzl.dlg@40tude.net> <1a9k0vk46bqrq.1cx6cdld0wd9f$.dlg@40tude.net> <67adnc2Fg68OzgHYnZ2dnUVZ_rylnZ2d@megapath.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: mailhost.axlog.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: s1.news.oleane.net 1167991265 22033 195.25.228.57 (5 Jan 2007 10:01:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@oleane.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 10:01:05 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207) In-Reply-To: Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8079 Date: 2007-01-05T10:08:32+01:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt a �crit : > However, you alluded to a real concern in another message. That is, it's > possible to write two different identifiers that look the same. That would > be confusing and possibly cause problems. But that's already possible > (depending on the font), so it just is a slight expansion of a problem that > already exists. And it certainly can be handled with style checkers > (identifiers containing mixes of Latin, Cyrillic, or Greek characters are > suspicious, as are identifiers differing only by the replacement of Latin > characters with Cyrillic equivalents). > :-) This check is already implemented in the wavefront version of AdaControl (not yet in the public version). -- --------------------------------------------------------- J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr) Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr