From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9081ae7069434ca5
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.73.229 with SMTP id o5mr2629682pbv.7.1328837382790;
        Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:29:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 wr5ni6874pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.internetdienste.de!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!jacob-sparre.dk!ada-dk.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Publishing selected entries in a protected object?
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 19:29:39 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <jh1ru5$hi9$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <87wr7wkyp5.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
 <4f33d158$0$7625$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1328837381 17993 69.95.181.76 (10 Feb 2012 01:29:41 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:29:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2012-02-09T19:29:39-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Georg Bauhaus" <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> wrote in message 
news:4f33d158$0$7625$9b4e6d93@newsspool1.arcor-online.net...
> On 09.02.12 12:56, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
>> I have a package containing a protected object, and I would like to
>> publish _one_ of this object's entries in the specification of the
>> package.
>
>
> Using synchronized interfaces should work?

It will often work, but there are some problems. We couldn't get the design 
of the Queue containers to work out properly, and we ended up with the 
horrifically ugly "Implementation" package.

I think that can be fixed, but it will require some new capabilities for 
protected types, and those may cause other problems. Oh well, Ada has to 
have some problems or the ARG wouldn't need an editor, and then I'd have to 
find some real work. ;-)

                                          Randy.