From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ad06d2d7cb045687
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.231.202 with SMTP id ti10mr1750795pbc.5.1328667910803;
        Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:25:10 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 lh20ni272599pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!goblin2!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: BrianG <me@null.email>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Silly and stupid post-condition or not ?
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:25:08 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <jgsme5$3kq$1@dont-email.me>
References: <op.v8w6ptk5ule2fv@douda-yannick>
	<82wr86fzos.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	<5af407fc-2868-44ca-84d2-c51a2a64104d@o4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
	<82k445fu9n.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <jgfjc4$u4b$1@munin.nbi.dk>	<m262focp3y.fsf@pushface.org>
 <jgq2a6$f15$1@dont-email.me> <m2aa4u6i0v.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 02:25:10 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="TtuQlFl1tCpi+XZRA9iuwg";
	logging-data="3738"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+urVer3XG47gj6Zl1vkiNG"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/3.1.16
In-Reply-To: <m2aa4u6i0v.fsf@pushface.org>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:VLblP1xlJ3X6+SpQGOGxnGuU5vs=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 2012-02-07T21:25:08-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 02/07/2012 05:43 AM, Simon Wright wrote:
> BrianG<me@null.email>  writes:
>
>> On 02/03/2012 03:12 AM, Simon Wright wrote:
>
>>> Does anywone know what software standards Toyota use? MISRA C?
>
>> According to Embedded Systems Design (I'd have to find the ref's),
>> they use none - they farm out the job.
>
> They would then be the customer, and would impose whatever standards
> they think appropriate on the contractor.
Then they would specify a standard, not use one.  If I remember 
correctly, what was reviewed was MISRA Bull, I mean MISRA C.
>
> I was talking to someone whose business made a locator system for people
> who get lost in foul weather; he didn't worry about external standards,
> he just did his best to get it right (and, I gathered, kept his fingers
> crossed).
But did he use his own products?  When he gets really lost?
Maybe I should forgo his product and just cross my fingers - cut out one 
step.

-- 
---
BrianG
000
@[Google's email domain]
.com